Saturday, July 2, 2016

Iranian and Chinese officials inked several agreements to expand scientific and technological cooperation between the two countries, INIC reports.

According to Iran Nanotechnology Initiative Council (INIC), various Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) in the fields of science and technology were signed between Iran's Presidential Office for Science and Technology and the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology and China Academy of Science during the visit of the East Asian country's president to Tehran.

Creation of Silk Road Science Fund, establishment of advanced technology parks in association with China, development of nanotechnology centers (INCC) and establishment of Iranian station to export therapeutic plants in China are among the most important MoUs signed in the field of science and technology.

The joint financial fund entitled Silk Road Science Fund facilitates mutual cooperation between the two parties by providing financial support through one of the following methods: Carrying out joint research, organization of joint workshops and exchanging researchers and university lecturers. Advanced technology fields include nanotechnology, cognitive sciences and technology, new energies and medical equipment.

More
Continue reading

Over the last decade, Iran has managed to achieve significant breakthroughs in the development of nanotechnologies and in the commercialization and manufacturing of nano products.

Professor Ali Beitollahi of the Iran University of Science and Technology and high-ranking member of the Iran Nanotechnology Initiative Council, told Sputnik that these achievements were made possible by strict adherence to the 10-Year Plan of Practical Implementation of Nanotechnologies (2005-2015).

More
Continue reading

Saeid Sarkar, while noting the presence of over 28,000 nanotechnology experts in Iran, said the country’s scientific ranking has improved this year to 6th by exceeding Japan, which now places Iran after China, US, India, S Korea and Germany.

Saeid Sarkar, Head of Iran Nanotechnology Initiative Council (INIC), made the announcement during the festival of top nanotechnology media, adding “presently, at the end of the first 10-year plan, we are standing among the top five countries in manpower development.”

“Iran has made considerable progress in the field of nanotechnology and has been successful in presenting a model for development and advancement,” he added.

More
Continue reading

Secretary of Nanotechnology Development Secretary of Presidential Office's Science and Technology Department announced that Iran and Russia have agreed on transfer and exchange of nanotechnology, IRNA reported.

'It was decided in the nano workgroup in the third high Iran-Russia technology Cooperation that Iran would transfer nano carbon tubes to Russia and Russia will in turn export anti-corrosion coverings from Russia to Iran,' Saeed Sarkar said on Sunday.

More
Continue reading

Friday, July 2, 2010

The July 1960 break in the Sino-Soviet alliance definitely wasn't a one-time event. The Chinese leaders understood the inevitability of separation by 1958 and did their best to accumulate by all means available - including direct theft - thousands and thousands of sets of the most-advanced Soviet technologies, i.e., weapons know-how, dual-use goods and heavy machinery.

After July 1960, China proclaimed the general course of "basing on our own forces" and concentrating forces on reproducing (reverse engineering, or "guochanhua" in Chinese) the Soviet technology.

China abandoned this autarchy and reinstated ties with the "outer world" after the start of the Great Reform in December 1978. And it appeared that, by the early 1980s, China had completed the reverse engineering of Soviet weapons and heavy machinery.

Generally, it is possible to claim that by about 1984, China acquired the capability to produce - and really master production of, sometimes in single copies - entire sets of Soviet weapons and dual-use products belonging to 1960-61 standards. This in particular included the following (Soviet name first, Chinese name in parentheses):

* First-generation ICBM R-7 (DF (Dongfeng)-5) as well as first generation IRBM (intermediate-range ballistic missile);

* First-generation satellite (Dongfanghong);

* First-generation nuclear strategic submarine (Xia class);

* First-generation nuclear attack submarine (Han class);

* Second-generation diesel-electric submarine (Ming class);

* First- and second-generation destroyers, frigates and patrol craft;
* Second-generation fighter MiG-21 (J-7) and first-generation bomber TU-28 (H-6);

* First-generation air-defense missile system S-75 (HQ (Hongqi)-2), etc.

Ground troops weaponry of all kinds was not inferior to Soviet levels of 1961-65.

Not surprisingly, at the first Chinese military parade in 25 years, on Oct. 1, 1984, in Beijing, it appeared that China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) was as good as the Soviet army in 1959-61. The same was evidently true for China's defense industry.

Among the reverse-engineered heavy machinery one can mention 300,000-kilowatt generators, mastered by production in 1958 in the USSR and in 1978-80 in China.

Why did it take so long for China to reproduce Soviet military and dual-use technology? That's because China's industrial-technological base was very weak and obsolete in this period. For example, manufacturing the MiG-21 jet engine required a precision level, in metal processing, of 3 microns. China's best machinery plants obtained this technology only in 1979. Generally, in the first half of the 1980s, China's technological gap with the USSR was still greater than 20 years.

A new large-scale cycle of guochanhua was launched in 1984-85. Deng Xiaoping produced the following directive here: (a) importation of foreign machinery, electronics, other high-tech goods (easy); (b) guochanhua (rather difficult but possible); (c) improvement (very difficult); (d) development of principally new products and technologies (in practice, impossible in the Chinese environment).

This time, not the weaponry but high-grade consumer goods - color TVs, tape recorders, refrigerators, washing machines, etc. - became the major objects of guochanhua. The share of Chinese parts in 14-inch color TVs reached 75 percent. This is how the base of the Chinese electronics industry was established. Of course, the broad access to Western non-military technology facilitated these processes.

By the early 1990s, China was capable of producing and even exporting, in millions of units, almost all modern consumer electronics and electrical consumer goods and, what is very important, all their modules and spare parts – except, probably, for integrated circuits (ICs), which China still imported. The lag behind international standards in this technological sector became minimal and even negligible.

During the 1990s, China acquired new successful experience in guochanhua of advanced personal computers (except for large ICs) and their peripherals; heavy trucks, modern cars, vans and motorcycles; U.S. McDonnell Douglas-series large passenger aircraft (except for engines and, probably, avionics) and French helicopters; and VCRs, DVDs, audio systems, air conditioners, large-screen color TVs, etc.

Newly accumulated economic and technological potential permitted an increase in the "guochanhua level" (Chinese-made share of the components) up to 75 percent to 90 percent – without loss of quality. Only the most sophisticated parts and modules - too costly to produce in China or belonging to the "leading edge" of world technology - were still coming from abroad.

Weaponry Guochanhua in 1996-2001

In 1996, China started a new cycle of military modernization. Already by 1999 (as was clearly demonstrated in the Beijing military parade on Oct. 1, 1999), the PLA had acquired much new weaponry - both purchased in Russia or Chinese-made or, more exactly, based on Russian technology and manufactured with the use of Russian kits and spare parts.

PLA modernization in 2000-2001 was characterized by the broad introduction of "Chinese" weapons and dual-use products, with significant use of Russian (as well as Ukrainian and Belarusian) parts. Only the most important products of this kind are listed below:

* J-11 (improved copy of SU-27 SK) fighter, assembled at the Shenyang Aircraft Corp.; by the end of 2001, only engines, radars and some other avionics came from Russia.

* J-10 and FC-1 fighters, prepared by late 2001 for serial production at Chengdu Aircraft Corp. Both use Russian engines and radars.

* FBC-1 (Flying Leopard) fighter-bomber, assembled at the Xian Aircraft Corp.; uses engines from Rolls Royce Corp. in the UK (the Russian side couldn't provide engines of the necessary level).

* Solid-fuel, road-mobile DF-31 ICBM and its submarine-launch variety, the JL-II, prepared by early 2002 for serial production in Sichuan province. This ICBM is based on Soviet technology and evidently uses some Russian and Belarusian components.

* In November 1999 and February 2001, China launched a manned spacecraft prototype, Shenzhou, with a LM (Long March)-F2 missile booster. Both are based on Russian technology and use some Russian-made modules.

* Hongniao (HN)-series long range land-attack cruise missiles, whose production was mastered in 1998-2001 in Langfang city, near Beijing, with the use of Russian technology and components.

* Improved Song and "Super-Kilo" diesel-electric submarines, which came to the PLA navy in 1999-2001, use a great amount of Russian Kilo-type submarine high-tech and components.

* The Luhai-class missile destroyer, the best of Chinese-made naval vessels, uses Ukrainian engines and evidently some technology of Russia's Sovremenny-class destroyer.

* The "093" class nuclear attack submarine and "094" class strategic submarine, presently under production in Huludao, Liaoning province, are entirely based on Russian technology and use key Russian-made components.

* The FT-2000 long-range anti-radar air-defense missile (ADM), serially produced in 2000-2001, is almost a copy of Russia's S-300 ADM. Besides, by late 2001, the Chinese-made "slightly improved copies" of Russia's S-300 PMU-1 long-range ADM, Tor-M1 medium-range ADM, and short-range Tunguska air-defense missile-artillery system, were mastered in serial production or close to this stage. And all of them used some Russian components.

* The type-98 tank and other mobile weapons for ground troops are based on "Russian technology, Ukrainian engines and Belarusian chassis" (according to Taiwanese sources).

Technological Breakthroughs of 2002

By early 2002, China had reached a new level of economic-technological development, significantly surpassing Russia's. This allowed China to accomplish several serious breakthroughs and approach "technological independence" in weaponry R&D and production. Only the major facts are given below:

1. In March 2002, aircraft industry enterprises in Zhuzhou, Hunan province, completed development of the first Chinese turbofan engine, to be used in the K-8 fighter-trainer (earlier it used Ukrainian turbofan engines). And in May 2002, Shenyang Jet Engine Research Institute concluded development of the much more advanced "Kunlun" turbofan engine.

According to a description, this is evidently an improved copy of Russia's AL-31 turbofan engine, used with some varieties of the aforementioned SU-27, SU-30, J-11 and J-10 fighters. China's domestic share of the components (the "guochanhua level") in the J-10 and J-11 fighters thus automatically rose from 70 percent or 75 percent to 90 percent or more. This, in practice, means technological independence in manufacturing fourth-generation fighters, at a comparatively low cost.

2. In late March 2002, China successfully launched the unmanned Shenzhou-3 spacecraft, much more advanced than the aforementioned Shenzhou-1 and the Shenzhou-2. According to several reports in the Chinese media, this time the Shenzhou spacecraft and its LM-F2 missile booster were made entirely or almost entirely of Chinese components.

China acquired technological independence in R&D and manufacturing of large spacecraft and missile boosters for them. And this opens the way for Chinese space station construction.

3. According to statements of Chinese nuclear industry experts, by March 2002 this industry mastered the technology for making 600-megawatt thermal nuclear power generating sets and became capable of designing and manufacturing 1000-megawatt thermal nuclear power generators. This means that China's lag behind the Russian and, generally, the world nuclear industry has fallen to a minimum. That's for both civilian and military products.

4. In January-March 2002, one or two microelectronics enterprises in Shanghai began production of large-scale ICs with a minimal feature size of 0.18 micron (it is called 0.18-micron technology level; by the way, Russia has nothing of this kind). The same enterprises intend to master, within two years, the manufacturing of ultra-large-scale ICs of 0.13-micron technological level; this is currently the best level in world microelectronics.

What is probably even more important: Introduction of ultra-large-scale ICs greatly expands the combat abilities of any modern weapon system.

5. In short, China has approached technological independence in a broad range of weapon systems and dual-use products. This is a fact of ultimate importance.

Moscow: China's J-15 was reverse-engineered from Su-33

Russia's government said last week that China's prototype J-15 jet fighter is a pirated copy of the Sukhoi Su-33 fighter bomber, highlighting China's continued reverse-engineering and technology acquisition piracy.

Russia’s Novyy Region news agency reported June 4 that Chinese engineers have assembled the first prototype of the J-15, an advanced warplane considerd a “fourth-generation deck-based fighter.”

“The copy was developed on the basis of one of the first Sukhoy prototypes — the Soviet-era T10K experimental aircraft, which China received from Ukraine in 2005,” the report said. “Earlier, Beijing tried to purchase two Su-33 aircraft from the Russian Federation, but Moscow refused to sell the fighters, fearing a leakage of technologies.”

The J-15 prototype has folding wings and is the jet that many believe will be deployed on China’s new aircraft carrier, which is in development.

China also copies other Russian fighters, mass producing the J-10, J-11, and FC-1 fighters, based on copies of Russia's Su-27, Su-30 and MiG-29.

China’s Su-33 knockoff is a single-seated fighter with a short take-off and arrested landing capability and a defenses.

foldable wing and horizontal tail unit. The aircraft is designed for anti-ship warfare with high-tech anti-ship.
Continue reading

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Jericho, located 400 meters below sea level near the Dead Sea. A witness discovers a body in the glaring sun. Minutes later, the police arrive. The crime scene is sealed off. Experts in white suits appear and examine evidence at the scene. It's all just a drill: German experts are training Palestinian police officers in criminal investigation techniques.

The body is actually just a dummy and was found on the grounds of the Palestinian police academy. The Palestinian experts, however, are real. After an 18-day training course, they demonstrate what they have learned to their German colleagues in a practical test.

Five German experts are spending three months training their Palestinian colleagues. Projects like this one are important for ensuring that a suitably trained and equipped Palestinian police force can provide security. The programme is being financed with funds provided by the Federal Foreign Office.

The Federal Criminal Police Office has seconded experts in crime scene work and investigation techniques for a three-month stay. Each month these experts train 50 police officers – including trainers who will increasingly assume responsibility for the training programme in the future. The first 50 participants completed their training on 7 May. This measure builds on the successful cooperation of the past year.
Functioning states need functioning security forces

A two-state solution in the Middle East requires effective Palestinian structures. These include an adequately trained and equipped police force which is in a position to provide security.

It is important for the population on both sides to feel that peace is worthwhile. Only when the Palestinian side is able to ensure sustainable security will Israel be able to place trust in a future Palestinian state.
Police work: The basis for due process in criminal cases

Proper due process begins with crime scene investigation. Evidence must be professionally secured, stored and transported, witnesses must be interrogated in a targeted manner.

If these things are not done properly, it is difficult for the investigation to lead to a conviction that meets rule-of-law criteria.
Continue reading

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research today (KUSTR) in Abu Dhabi announced it will set up a nanotechnology research center in collaboration with the Asian Nano Forum. The announcement was made during the 5th Asian Nano Forum Summit which started today in Abu Dhabi.

The 2-day summit, which is being organized by KUSTR at the National Exhibition Centre (ADNEC) in Abu Dhabi involves more than 30 delegates at a senior level from 14 countries in the Asian region.

The Summit provides an opportunity to set the strategic and economic directions for nanotechnology within the Asian region for the next decade. The summit will also involve keynote speeches and workshops delivered by experts with substantial achievements and influence in research and development in each economy.
The summit is organized with the technical support from the Asia Nano Forum (ANF) headquarters in Singapore and the sponsorship of the Emirates Telecommunications Corporation (Etisalat).

"Hosting this summit will provide a venue for us to benefit from the knowledge and expertise of other countries, and will be the start of much useful collaboration. We hope that this will be the initial step towards the establishment of nanotechnology research, development, and industry in the country," said Dr. Arif Al-Hammadi, Manager of KUSTR.

In parallel with the Summit, Khalifa University will also host in its Abu Dhabi Campus a workshop on Nanotechnology K-12 Education. The workshop is organized by the Institute of Applied Technology (IAT) in collaboration with Taiwan. This UAE-Taiwan joint-workshop will invite about 15 Taiwanese university professors and school teachers to share with their UAE counterparts how they teach nanotechnology in elementary schools, junior high schools, and senior high schools.
Continue reading

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Nanotechnology, shortened to "nanotech", is the study of the controlling of matter on an atomic and molecular scale.

Generally nanotechnology deals with structures of the size 100 nanometers or smaller in at least one dimension, and involves developing materials or devices within that size.

Nanotechnology is very diverse, ranging from extensions of conventional device physics to completely new approaches based upon molecular self-assembly, from developing new materials with dimensions on the nanoscale to investigating whether we can directly control matter on the atomic scale.
Continue reading